RSS Sign up for our newsletter!

If you would like to join our blog, send us an email at admin@ damselsinsuccess.com!

Popular Posts

View Posts by Author

View Posts by Topic

View Posts by Month

Lauren Della Monica

Lauren Della Monica

Lauren Pheeney Della Monica graduated from Vanderbilt with a degree in art history and Spanish Literature in 1995.  Lauren completed a program in art connoisseurship at Christie’s, NY.  She then worked at an American paintings gallery and at the Citibank Private Bank Art Advisory Service, assisting clients with purchasing fine art and valuing artwork for loan portfolios.  As a complement to her arts training, Lauren received her JD in 2001.  While in law school, she interned in the General Counsel’s office at The Museum of Modern Art.  Lauren practiced commercial litigation and art law at a firm for two years.  She then launched her art consulting business, LPDM Fine Art Consulting, in 2004.

Ladies Who Lunch

Yesterday I met a friend/client for lunch at a lovely restaurant known for its salads and pastries. There were quite a number of tables inhabited by pairs of women.  I arrived five minutes early, so I was seated in a corner table on a banquet, right beside two lunching ladies who were in their mid 50s. I could not help but overhear their conversation, try as I might to check my email on my Treo, turn off the ringer, write myself a list in my pocket notebook, and drink my newly poured glass of cold water. But, they were just inches away, and I could hear every word. And I was fascinated. Lady A and Lady B were discussing some women they know who never had children, and so they also have no grandchildren. My mind was racing with each statement made. Their take is that because these other women have not had kids (and these are all quotes as best I can remember them):

(Lady A) "They care more about which restaurant we go to and less about friendship. They will say things like, "Oh, I can't eat there. The food is terrible." It is as though they don't know what is important in life because they have not had children. Lunch should be about the friendship not about where you eat. If the food is edible that should be good enough."

(LPDM -- I just have to interject my thoughts) I simply don't understand the logic. How does a woman's womb have anything to do with where she dines for Caesar salad in her 50s? Perhaps the women at issue are not interested in the same menus, in which case perhaps they should not dine together. But why is this about reproductive history? And then how exactly does reproductive history inform one's understanding of friendship? I thought friendships were learned and developed early on in life before the age of reproduction (and continued long after the childbearing years).

(Lady B) "It is just terrible. When you are seated at a table and all the rest of us have children and grandchildren to talk about it is just so terrible. They have nothing. They have nothing to add to the conversation because they have nothing in their lives. So, I just shoot the others a look and try to turn the conversation away from families."

(LPDM) Excuse me. Hearing you talk about your children and grandchildren is probably boring and something which others (parents, grandparents or otherwise) tolerate to an extent out of politeness and custom. A few minutes of that kind of proud mother/grandmother talk at any ladies lunch is acceptable, but it can get old fast whether you are a parent or not.  And wait, don't you have anything else to talk about besides your family? Is your life that empty? Not having children and grandchildren does not mean you have nothing in your life. It means that you don't have THAT in your life. It means that perhaps you can't relate on that topic any more than when a group of men sit around discussing basketball scores and you are not a fan so you are probably bored and have nothing to add. It does not make you empty, just off topic. Go ahead, change the topic. But please don't do it out of pity.

(Lady A) "I know. They always need to talk about themselves because they don't have families to talk about. They need attention. I notice that they create illnesses to talk about just to get attention because they have not had children and they don't know how to put themselves second and care for other people first. They don't know that the world is not all about them and they don't know how to care about anyone else."

(LPDM) In an age when baby boomers are having to care for their own aging, and perhaps ailing, parents in record numbers according to many sources I find it hard to believe that simply not having children will absolve anyone from ever having to care for anyone else. Chances are they care for their spouse as well as for themselves. They also have had parents at some point and may have had to care for them, and maybe even for a sibling at some time, or another friend or a pet. Women have lots of care taking roles in their lives and the need is only projected to grow over the coming years. I guess it only counts for Lady A and Lady B, though, if you care for your children.

Maybe their childless "friends" are terribly self-centered, vapid hypochondriacs and if so, I think all of these women should stop having lunch together and perhaps give up the charade of friendship. It sounds dreadful. However, if a friend comes to you to discuss her illness have an ounce of compassion -- maybe your friend is scared about being ill and needs some support.  Since you are such a warm, giving, family-oriented woman perhaps you could spare some kindness and lend your friend a shoulder rather than vilifying her for talking to you.

(Lady B) "Well, you know, they are bored in their marriages and they don't have children or grandchildren to distract them. That's their problem."

(LPDM) Oh, so not having children means one has a problem. I see. Lady, other people's marriages are none of your business. As my dear friend once said to me, "If you aren't in it, don't judge it." Hard as that is sometimes, it is good advice. Maybe Lady B has some marital issues of her own that she is projecting?  And I don't think anyone would say that having kids saves a bad marriage. No matter how much you love your children, it is still a bad marriage but with more pressure and responsibility.

Finally (and this is really the big one) how dare you be so judgemental!  You can never know why someone does not have children.  Perhaps it is a conscious decision not to have children and to choose a different lifestyle. Not everyone wants to be a parent, and it is not for you to judge. Perhaps the woman desperately wants kids but has been unable to conceive and has been through years of agonizing and expensive fertility procedures. Perhaps the woman never found the right partner with whom to have children or her timing was off and so it never worked out. My point is that simply having children does not make you better than someone who does not have them. It just makes you different.

Ah, thank goodness. My lunch partner has arrived. Now we can get down to our business of talking about her newborn, our love and lives and our business transaction!

My need to have children simply never surfaced. Frankly, I liked animals better, and despite family and spousal pressure, I knew I would not be good at parenting. Now, at sixty-six, there are times when I get overloaded with hearing about other people's children--especially grandchildren. But I hold to my original decision in childhood (made at age 18) that I simply did not want children. For me it has been the correct decision. I'm convinced I would have been my mother, and she was not a great role-model.

Posted by Anonymous 7:06pm , March 27, 2010

wow. As a young, chlidless woman who intends on staying that way for the rest of her like, I can very easily tell you it is difficult to speak to women with children for me. I have no interest in how cute your child looks when he spits up on you. Gee, so sorry. Of course, people who have never worked abroad can't understand how much working abroad changed me as a person. Those who have never done it can easily become bored with conversations about working abroad and will never really "get" why it was such a transformative experience. I don't necessarily think less of people who have never done any work or living abroad, but I do have a more difficult time connecting with them since working and traveling abroad means so much to me and so little to them. We tend to gravitate to those who we have things in common with. Of course, as far as the child-bearing aspect is concerned, it has been my experience that women CHOOSING not to have kids is so outside of the spectrum for a lot of people that a woman who makes this choice is always going to be confronted with the big "why" question and looks of pity where none are needed or wanted. But, to be fair, I can't really hide my look of pity/irritation when I was recently on a plane and a woman was trying to get her baby to quit shrieking at the top of her lungs. Oh yeah -- I'm really missing out on a lot, I'm sure.

Posted by Anonymous 6:08pm , August 18, 2009

Motherhood can be all consuming, but isn't it healthier to be able to set aside that part of life and share some other interests over a lunch? Being obsessed about anything, no matter how huge the commitment is, leads into a position of dependence on that one thing to define the world and our spot in it. It's a much more interesting time spent with friends when we discuss many aspects of life, in addition to our kids. It would be sad to allow just one area dominate our connections and relationship with each other. I'd rather have balance represented by who's into current events, fashion, politics as well as the PTO, instead of who's turn is it for the carpool.

Posted by Anonymous 7:23am , December 29, 2008

I am one of those women who has a career and no children by choice. It is very difficult to find other women like myself to socialize with. The majority of my business contacts are male and I have more male type interests than female type interests. I follow college football, have a fantasy football tea, am a Cubs fan, like to fish etc.. It is tough to have a relationship with someone whose interests are totally different. I would love to know if there are other women out there that enjoy these interests and how you have been able to find friends to do things with, like lunch or even fishing.

Posted by Sandy 10:25am , September 6, 2008

Let's not be hypocritical here. The ladies whom you were listening to were being judgmental, but your response is also very judgmental. Everyone has differences of opinion, just take a look at your own life. Has there NEVER been a time where you've made assumptions of a person based on your own personal opinion?

Posted by Anonymous 10:31am , August 7, 2008

WOW my mouth literally hung open after each of those women's statements. You've just confirmed my worst fear... people pity my childlessness! ;)

Posted by Korenski 8:49pm , July 14, 2008

To each her own?

Posted by Anonymous 12:40pm , June 30, 2008

You think maybe they ae envious of us who have no children and have never been married. Envious of the freedom that we have. I love kids but since the right person has not come along I am not interested in having kids with a crazy man. Because they were discussing maybe it something lacking in their lives as well. They are not happy in their marriages. That is why there was a big discussion about it. I am 37 years old, single and happy with no man or children.

Posted by Inndia Johnson 2:56am , June 7, 2008

On my, I've heard people like this quite often. And when they find out that not only haven't I had a child, but I've also never been married, AND I'm quite happy with my life. Well, the looks of pity and disbelief are amusing if nothing else. Sheesh, life would be so boring if everyone did everything exactly the same!

Posted by kas 4:44pm , May 28, 2008

Another mommy war?

Posted by Anonymous 3:03pm , April 24, 2008

I swear to you, it is true. I was taking notes! I was as shocked as you are, Julie, and I could not wait to share this with my friends. I thought Damsels would also make a good place for discussion about it. I have to say, I thought the things these women said were so crazy and offensive that no one else would ever agree with them, but as you can see from the comments below that is not necessarily the case. I think that actually makes the debate more interesting, though a bit scarier than I anticipated.

I also think perhaps some of the "wow" factor here is really based on a generational difference between these women and those of us in or near our 30s. Though there are many great, successful, educated women in their late 50s and 60s I think these types of comments would be less prevalent and accepted in women in, say their 30s. Or perhaps the issue is socio-economic, and these women never even consdered being career women or anything outside the home. In any case, I don't think these types of comments are mainstream in any location, socio-economic group or age group as they were so condescending and rude.

Posted by Lauren Della Monica 1:15pm , April 7, 2008

LPDM, did those women really say that? Do women really say things like this? I'm speechless.

Posted by Julie 12:44pm , April 7, 2008

Just got this link fwd. WOW.

Posted by Anonymous 11:17am , April 3, 2008

good stuff -- crazy ladies. good for calling a spade. guess i kind of get everyone's poitns. anyone know any other blogs/articles on this stuff?

Posted by mercedes 9:29am , April 3, 2008

This is a fascinating and raw discussion. I see so many "angles" here. I really do understand the empathy angle (below - anon3:19) and the judgment angle (LPDM + Kate, et. al.) I also sense real sadness and frustration in all the posts that women are, once again, at odds with each other. I hear some of what anon8:32 says, in that children can be transformative. But I also see how so many aspects of our lives are also transformative and yet that doesn't (or shouldn't) distance us from each other. I applaud -- truly applaud -- Lauren for her honesty and bravery in bringing this issue forward, uniquely from her perspective. Perhaps the point could have been more nuanced (though I doubt it would have caused such a stir had it been!). And certainly some of the comments could have been more aware of their implications or sharp angles (there is no need for venom). What I hope comes of this and other discussions like this (I will write formally on this soon) is that women should be allowed to make different choices with their lives. As soon as we stop celebrating that freedom, we loose sight of ourselves and our richness. Lauren, you are valued, with or without children. As a mother of two, I hope I am valued with and without my children. Certainly, whether we have children informs our lives, but it doesn't singularly define them. Good luck to us all.

Posted by Allison 4:15pm , April 2, 2008

I just read Anon832's point(s). I guess they make sense; so do the responses, too. But I'm confused why everyone's so angry about this?!? Don't we all agree that sometimes we go through transformative experiences that change us? Like kids, yeah, but also like having cancer, or losing a parent, or (less dramatic) being forced to move somewhere where we know no one. I think people have the capacity to be really sympathetic, but maybe what I'm saying is that empathy is often hard to come by unless you've been in the same position. And sometimes in your life you need people with empathy. It doesn't mean that you don't need/like/respect/appreciate/love the other people. Just that sometimes you need and want to be with people who empathize. Look, I'm not totally agreeing with Anon832 (or the other posts like that), but I think, being generous, that's probably what these posts are saying. In this world, we should really try to cultivate more sympathy and compassion, and yet be honest enough to know when we just don't have the knowledge to be empathetic. Lauren's post is really interesting but it's really angry, defensive, and unkind. Those women are terrible, but I doubt most women/mommies really feel that way. I just don't understand why people are so unable to see the 'empathy' angle here? Please explain.

Posted by Anonymous 3:19pm , April 2, 2008

I'm a mom with 3 kids and I once felt like anon832. That was before I went back to work fulltime. When I was home I couldn't relate to my friends who didn't have children because my life was nothing but children. Now that I'm working again, my life is more than children. And so therefore i have a lot in common with many people, moms or not. I actually enjoy not having to be a mom all the time as much as I love my children and being their loving mother. And anon832, nothing wrong with what you are saying but you do sound like a very new mommie. It's a beautiful experience and as some of the ladies here have said, I guess telling people how wonderful it is can be annoying also. I lost some friends when I became a new mom and I wish that didn't happen. I don't blame myself for that because motherhood is so deeply changing and I couldn't be bothered to attend to anyone who did not fully get what my life was like. But in hindsight I do wish it had been easier to have the best of all worlds. Good luck to you!

Posted by Mary Elizabeth 8:18pm , March 14, 2008

anon @ 8:32: I understand your point. Really, I do. But you're missing something. Just because having kids is transformative and changes your life which, believe it or not, women without kids can appreciate, it shouldn't change your life so much that you find it hard to relate to women who don't have children and think that they've missed out on some transformative experience that only you understand. In saying that, you are just like these lunching women who think they are in fact BETTER. How about just talking as women instead of as moms or single women or women without kids? How about just talking to your girlfriend about your life as a mom and her life as a non-mom? If you are so much a mom that you think you live such a different life, I think 10 years from now you will find you lost some of yourself. I am sure women without children will have their regrets too but I don't know a lot of women without kids who are so arrogant as you seem to be and the women that the author is criticizing.

Posted by angela 7:48pm , March 14, 2008

What kind of woman can't be friends with someone whose experiences are different from their own? What a dull life I would have if I only hung out with women who had a dog, a kid, a husband and a job in my industry. No, I don't know what working at a law firm is like or what owning a cat is like. I don't know what is like to be an army wife or a 30 year old virgin, but I have friends who are all of those things and I (hope) am a good friend to each as they are each very good friends to me despite not being where I am. What a sad state that those women and "Anonymous 8:32 pm" think you have to share experiences to be a good friend.

Posted by Kate 3:14pm , March 14, 2008

I don't know better???? You sound just like them. Good luck to you.

Posted by Lauren Della Monica 9:57am , March 14, 2008

woah! you seem really enraged, which i totally get given the ladies' bald judgment, but you seem to have overlooked something. yes, we should all be less judgmental about other people's life choices. but it's normal that people who are alike or make the same choices gravitate toward each other -- like people with kids. look, i don't mean to be rude, but maybe there's something here. having kids is a totally transformative experience, different than most other life experiences. i know. i was without kids for years and then have recently had my first. people without kids just don't get it -- how could they? it's one of those things you only get if you've done it. that's not politically correct to say, but it's true. and when you don't have kids, you don't get what you don't get. that doesn't mean people with kids are better or more interesting people. it just means that there's this critical, formative, integral part of their life that you probably discount too heavily because you just don't know better. still, that doesn't excuse these ladies, but step back, breath, and think about it for a sec.

Posted by Anonymous 8:32pm , March 13, 2008

great point by the previous commentator. we all spent most of our lives being childless but, suddenly, when we have children, we simply can't relate to a woman who is not a mother? what does that say about the degree to which most women forget themselves when they become mothers? i think mothers should think about that. and, most of my friends who are moms complain that they have lost themselves so maybe such women should make sure to keep some childless women friends since those women can have conversations with you that have nothing to do with you being a mom.

Posted by Alisha 4:04pm , March 10, 2008

How can it be difficult to relate to childless women -- weren't you one youself for many years?????

Posted by Anonymous 8:45am , March 10, 2008

I am a mom and although I understand why these women's attitude is frustrating, I understand it also. I have friends who don't have children and it's difficult to relate to them sometimes. I don't judge anyone for not having children but I have found that I just don't have as much in common with women who don't.

Posted by Anonymous 12:50pm , March 6, 2008

I wish those lunching ladies read this site! Would be so funny for them to read your post.

Posted by Anonymous 12:19pm , March 6, 2008

These women's level of ignorance is entertaining, even if it is appalling (or, at least, your telling of the story is entertaining). I would never want to hang out with them. They seem obsessed with themselves and their "perfect" lives. My husband and I do not have children but are trying, and if we do not end up being parents, we'll survive and - though these women wouldn't believe it - we'll have meaningful and rich lives with or without kids. It's possible, we've been doing it for years.

Posted by Joanna 12:58am , March 6, 2008

This is brilliant. I just had my first child at 40 and can remember many times when my friends behaved like younger versions of the women you are writing about. I remember them looking at me like I had a sad life and it was very frustrating. Although I have a child now, I will never be like these women, judging women who don't.

Posted by Anonymous 11:08pm , March 5, 2008

Post a Comment

Post as Anonymous

Email (Email address will NOT be displayed and is for verification purposes only.)

 

Comment