RSS Sign up for our newsletter!

If you would like to join our blog, send us an email at admin@ damselsinsuccess.com!

Popular Posts

View Posts by Author

View Posts by Topic

View Posts by Month

Hannah Seligson

Hannah Seligson

Hannah Seligson is an author and freelance journalist based in New York City. Her work has appeared in the New York Post, the Boston Globe, the Daily News, the Village Voice, and the Huffington Post. Hannah’s first book, New Girl on the Job: Advice from the Trenches, a career guide for young women, is scheduled for publication in the spring of 2007 by Citadel Press. Her second book, A Little Bit Married, an exploration of modern relationships, is scheduled for publication in 2008. She graduated with a B.A. in Political Science from Brown University in 2004. To learn more about "New Girl on the Job," please visit Hannah's web site at: www.hannahseligson.com.   

Carrie Bradshaw Goes Global. And Is That a Good Thing?

That’s the thesis of a piece called The New Girl Order by Kay S. Hymowitz in The City Journal. According to Hymowitz and data on the subject, the single young female (SYF) is bar-hopping, shopping, and bopping at night clubs from Warsaw to Tokyo.

Hymowitz says the proliferation of SYF culture is being driven by a few factors. Namely that they are pushing off marriage well into their thirties. She notes that in 1970 just 7.4 percent of all American 30-to-34-year-olds were unmarried; today, that number has increased threefold to 22 percent.

The trend is hugely promising, because it means that women are spending more time investing in their careers, hopefully paving the way for women earning 77 cents to the dollar to become an anachronism.

But let’s not kid ourselves; this piece could not just focus on the career inroads that young women are making. There had to be some mention of what I think most young women saw as the salient, or at least most compelling, storyline of Sex and the City: The search for Mr. Right.

While The New Girl Order is about having unprecedented earning power and multiple degrees, it’s also, Hymowiz says, sprinkled with “gyms for toning and male-watching: ski resorts and beach hotels; and, everywhere, the frustrating hunt for a boyfriend, and though it’s an ever more vexing subject, a husband.” And remind me why we can’t talk about young women and careers without talking about the hunt for a husband?

Here’s what vexes more (yes, even more than a hunt for a husband). It’s the cultural icons that have come to embody The New Girl Order. The Carrie Bradshaw character has little resemblance to the young women I know in this demographic. They are able to conduct simple arithmetic and, for the most part, manage their money. Carrie Bradshaw, however, realizes she spent the down payment on her apartment on shoes, only after Miranda correctly does the multiplication for her.

Then we have Bridget Jones, perhaps even more iconic than Bradshaw. Hymowitz notes that The Economist coined a term called the Bridge Jones economy. Jonesers, like Bradshaws, spend their disposable income on whatever is fashionable, frivolous, and fun.  Jones, though, if you remember, is always “on the edge of reason,” making a mockery of herself and a series of bad decisions about men that also lead her into an array of career compromising situations.

Hymowitz is right that there is much to admire in the New Girl Order. If only we could say the same for the women that seem to personify it.

This a wandering comment:
Its in our DNA to hunt for a mate. Its the same for men.
I feel my male friends are just as frivolous with money as my female friends. Actually, my female friends are pretty pragmatic.
My friends who are single just want companionship but definitely know what they want to do with their lives.
Its not so black and white. Its difficult but with anything hard it tends to be worthwhile. I do not have children so I cannot comprehend what it is to have a career and a child. I just know that my single mother worked 80hour weeks and raised me. She was never told that she could go to college, it took years of my nagging to push her to look into it (after i had finished college she signed up and has 3 more years to go).
There is a lot of crap thrown our way. I always find it amusing and am sometimes suckered into it. As with anything I come up for air and realize how precious this life is. I know what it is to be at the bottom and know that I have nothing to lose with trying. Its made me ambitious without realizing it and able to handle what is thrown at me. Life would be boring otherwise.
I don't blame my culture or the magazines or men. I kinda blame our lack of community. Women used to bond together and help each other out. So now, I just do that in my small way. Thats why this forum naturally happened. We are social creatures. None of us are alone in this struggle.

Posted by Gwendolyn 7:03pm , November 28, 2007

Most of the women I know are actually pretty focused on finding a husband. I don't think anything's wrong with that, as long as you aren't desperate. I actually think that "the hunt for a husband" is an important part of any conversation about career when it comes to women. Career choices and partner choices often influence each other very happy and I don't think there's anything wrong with acknowledging that.

Posted by Anonymous 5:07pm , October 18, 2007

The reason I like this site is that the woman who write for it exemplify a different kind of woman than the Carrie Bradshaws of the world. When I read the founder's mission, it hit me like a ton of bricks that, yes, it's true, there isn't a lot out there for women who have bigger priorities than shoes, wrinkle cream, and bar-hopping. Now, when I look at women's magazines, I see them in a whole new light. Before, they were just women's magazines and now I see them as little rags that perpetuate a stereotype of women that is offensive to me: a woman that lacks substance. The sad part is that women love those magazines even though they don't cater to our important needs. What is wrong with us??? Is the media turning us into junk by giving us junk, or does the media give us junk because we want junk? Chicken or the egg?

Posted by Anonymous 10:02am , October 18, 2007

Post a Comment

Post as Anonymous

Email (Email address will NOT be displayed and is for verification purposes only.)

 

Comment